![cohesion vs coherence cohesion vs coherence](http://image.slidesharecdn.com/cohesionandcoherence-130129034817-phpapp02/95/cohesion-and-coherence-12-638.jpg)
Louie rushed and got ready for work, but, when he went out the door, he saw the snowstorm was very heavy. The following text (devised by the writer on writing, Ann Raimes) is an example of a text that is "over-egged" with cohesive markers, and which is typical of the kind of texts that many students produce as a result of an over-emphasis on linking devices at the expense of other ways of making texts cohesive (of which probably the most important is lexis): Nevertheless, a text which is basically poorly organised is not going to be made more coherent simply by peppering it with moreover, however and notwithstanding. with cohesive devices such as and, but, so, can make it easier for the reader (or listener) to process and to make sense of what they read (or hear).
![cohesion vs coherence cohesion vs coherence](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bAsn9UQrwss/W6tTauBaFMI/AAAAAAAABxo/0D-6CZ6UEvQVxNmg8DqSkdn5v5GiX4NqgCLcBGAs/s1600/coherence.png)
While it is true that a sequence of unlinked utterances can make sense, it is often the case that some form of linking, e.g. The exact relationship between cohesion and coherence is a matter of contention, however. A text may be coherent to you, but incoherent to me. Thus, cohesion is objectively verifiable, while coherence is more subjective. Put simply, then: cohesion is a formal feature of texts (it gives them their texture), while coherence is "in the eye of the beholder" - that is to say, it is the extent to which the reader (or listener) is able to infer the writer's (or speaker's) communicative intentions. Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship.